The green thing

The Green Thing

Checking out at the store, the young cashier suggested to the older woman, that she should bring her  own grocery bags because plastic bags weren't good for the environment.The woman apologized and explained, "We didn't have this green thing back in my earlier days."The clerk responded, "That's our problem today. Your generation did not care enough to save our environment for future generations."She was right -- our generation  didn't have the green thing in its day.

 Back then, we returned milk bottles, soda bottles and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed and sterilized and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over. So they really were recycled. But we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store  and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a 300-horsepower machine every time we had to go two blocks.But she was right.We didn't have the green thing in our day.

Back then, we washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throw-away kind. We dried clothes on  a line, not in an energy gobbling machine burning up 220 volts – wind and solar power  really did dry our clothes back in our early days. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not always brand-new clothing. But that young lady is right; we didn't have the green thing back in our day.

Back then, we had one TV, or radio,  in the house -- not a TV in every room. And the TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief (remember them?), not a screen the size of the state of Montana . In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines  to do everything for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we  used wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam or plastic bubble wrap. Back then, we didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn.  We used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working so we didn't need to go to a  health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity. But she's right; we didn't have the green thing back then.

We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we  replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole razor just because the blade got dull. But we didn't have the green thing back then.

Back then, people took the streetcar or a bus and kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service. We had one electrical outlet in a room, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen appliances. And we didn't need a computerized gadget  to receive a signal beamed from satellites 2,000 miles out in space in order to find the nearest pizza joint.

 But isn't it sad that the current generation laments how wasteful we old folks were just because we didn't have the green thing back then?
  
 Please forward this on to another selfish old person who needs a lesson in conservation from a smart-arse young person.

Something to Remember: Don't make old People  mad.  We don't like being old in the first place, so it doesn't take much to piss us off.

What kind of personality makes false allegations

As a victim of false allegations of child sexual abuse and domestic violence I found this article interesting. What I find more offensive than the false court testismony is the sad fact that the corrupt judicial and political systems  don't allow a falsely accused father to ever clear his name as a good dad. The law works on fear and I can assure you our politicial and legal systems are nothing more than feminist weapons of war.

Take my arm bitch but don't call me a kid f##ker dad.

 I have faith that the Lord will avenge my terrible injustice.




http://www.shrink4men.com/2011/08/24/false-allegations-in-divorce-and-custody-battles-the-personality-types-of-false-accusers-and-the-falsely-accused/

10 Incredible Facts About The Criminal Brain.

Hi,

We would love to share with you an article that we just posted on our own blog! “10 Incredible Facts About the CriminalBrain” is linked below and could be a fun way for your readers to gothrough it.

(http://www.criminaljusticedegreesguide.com/features/10-incredible-facts-about-the-criminal-brain.html)

It has been a sincere pleasure to read yourgreat content.
                         

Sincerely,
JaySmith 

False allegations hurt good dads everywhere.

False allegations hurt a decent father, but the New Zealand Family Court enjoys destroying innocent dads like myself. This country owes me big time. My story is sad and built around false allegations of child sexual abuse. Unlike the NZ High Court at least the British High Court gets it right.How come we don't come down hard on lying women? Maybe a High Court judge or our silly Justice Minister could answer my question? Yeah right -they don't care!
Read more

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2028908/Daughter-race-horse-trainer-
A top racehorse trainer 'coached' her young daughter to say her father had
sexually abused her, the High Court heard today.
Twisted Victoria Haigh manufactured sex abuse allegations about ex-partner
David Tune then encouraged her daughter, now seven, to repeat them.
Ms Haigh, who was locked in a custody battle with Mr Tune, hired a private
investigator and together they spread the malicious accusations via e-mail
and over the internet.
But Sir Nicholas Wall, President of the Family Division of the High Court,
said the claims were untrue and Ms Haigh's actions had been 'wholly
contrary' to her daughter's interests.
He said he had decided to sit in open court so that the public could be told
that Mr Tune was 'not a paedophile' and made an order that Ms Haigh could
not make any application in relation to her daughter without his permission
for two years.
Sir Nicholas ruled that Ms Haigh and Mr Tune could be identified, but he
said the little girl - referred to as 'x' in court - should not be named.
He told the court: 'Allegations of sexual abuse were first made by the
mother and not by x.
'These were false and the mother knew them to be false.'
He added: 'X was coached by the mother to make allegations of sexual abuse
against the father.'
Sir Nicholas said two judges examined the case at previous High Court
hearings and both found that Mr Tune was not a paedophile and had not
sexually abused his daughter.
'The first judge found that allegations of sexual abuse made against the
father of a young child were not just untrue but manufactured by the child's
mother, who then caused her daughter to repeat them,' said Sir Nicholas.'
'Because the mother was wholly incapable of fostering a relationship between
her daughter and the child's father, refused to accept the judge's findings
and continued to assert that the father was a paedophile, a second judge
found that her mother had caused the child significant harm.'
The little girl, now living with her father, was subject to a care plan
organised by a local authority in, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, the hearing
in London was told.
Judges have previously heard evidence about the case at private hearings.
He added: 'The child's mother is wholly unable to accept the court's verdict
and, with the misguided assistance of Elizabeth Watson has unlawfully and in
breach of court orders put into the public domain via email and the internet
a series of unwarranted and scandalous allegations about the father and
others.
'She has repeated the untruth that the father is a paedophile and - without
a scintilla of evidence - has attacked the good faith of all the
professionals who had had any contact with the case.
'I have read all the papers in the case carefully. The father of the child,
who may be named, is not a paedophile and he has not sexually abused his
daughter. Two judges have so found.'
He added: 'I have come to the conclusion that ... I should ... give a public
judgment in which I explain, having read all the papers in the case, that I
have reached the same conclusion as the two previous judges.'
Sir Nicholas went on: 'These proceedings have had a serious effect on the
life of the father and have threatened the stability of the child. Her
mother's actions are wholly contrary to her interests.
'The father is entitled to tell the world, and the world is entitled to
know, that he is not a paedophile, that he has not sexually abused his
daughter and that the allegations made against him are false.'
END
--

Our kid care doesn't rate

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/5441231/Our-kid-care-doesn-t-rate


And they call this place the land of milk and honey. What a disgraceful statistic for such a tiny nation.
Man this country is the pits for children and I blame continuous callous socialists governments who couldn't give a toss about the serious plight many kiwi kids find themselves in.

The Flipside of Feminism: What Conservative Women Know -- and Men Can't Say

One in four NZ Children living in poverty.

As a responsible kiwi father of four New Zealand born children I am deeply ashamed that we fork-out $6 billion every year on the health, judicial, social and welfare costs associated with child poverty issues resulting from the deterioration of the family unit Happy kiwi kids need positive role model parents who take responsibility for providing them with a stable and happy childhood .The all important child nurturing years shouldn't be spent in a hideous poverty trap. Kids need stability and love in the nurturing years.

Many factors help with creating child poverty, however I have no doubts that government agencies and gender bias policy is directly responsible for large scale child poverty. Poor dysfunctional children are created through a fractured family industry that thrives on the destruction of the family unit. We live in a society that enjoys the widespread demonization of fatherhood. The criminal justice system and the feminist driven family court could not survive if we had fair gender balanced scales of justice.

The countless government paid commissioners, lawyers, psychologists, social workers and overpaid judges all make a healthy profit from the dysfunctional family file number. No thought is ever given to addressing the issues like fatherlessness that trigger most anti social child behaviours, as all resources are directed at the destruction of the father. Many dads simply walk away from their children, because they know that fighting for access and custodial matters in the feminist driven family court is an exercise in futility.Unhappy children are nurtured in hate lessons by the cruel and evil family court. Often the family court extends the misery for the paternal client and custodial cases can last 10 years. Mine did. Thanks Christchurch family court. How was that good for my four children Justice Minister? How much did my case cost the country Justice Minister? Was it $2 or $3 million??

The future of the traditional kiwi family is in doubt. Unfortunately it has been under serious attack by continual socialist governments, who are hell bent on obliterating family loyalties and strengths, because a stable family unit is the hardest for them to control. The manipulative socialists fear strong bonds of love and loyalty built into happy family units. Shady big government thrives on family dysfunction, which is extremely detrimental to the child's best interests.

http://nz.news.yahoo.com/a/-/world/10036210/one-in-four-nz-children-living-in-poverty/

MELANIE PHILLIPS: Britain's liberal intelligentsia has smashed virtually every social value

In such areas, successive generations are being brought up only by mothers, through whose houses pass transitory males by whom these women have yet more children — and who inevitably repeat the pattern of lone and dysfunctional parenting.

MELANIE PHILLIPS: Britain's liberal intelligentsia has smashed virtually every social value
Those of us who warned over the years that they were playing with fire were sneered at and smeared as Right-wing nutters.

Full Story:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2024690/UK-riots-2011-Britains-liberal-intelligentsia-smashed-virtually-social-value.html

Judge gets 28 years in 'kids for cash' case.

This sick kids for cash judge gets 28 years. Many in the Family Court make money from kids. I do not know how many of those evil judges sleep at night. I mean to say, they slaughter good dads in their Court Of Lies on a daily basis. The corrupt judicial fractured family business is a huge growth industry in this feminist socialist cess pit country. Poor kids will never experience the love of a father.

http://usat.ly/nAvmNE

I am a Woman against Feminism.

Awaken and Unite - Love is our Weapon.

Politicians tweaking the nose of radical feminism

"the extreme anti-male bias" of family courts".

Indeed Carey, the bias shown by the despicable creeps at the Christchurch Family Court actually killed my mother. Between the criminal actions of a Court appointed psychologist Dr John Watson and a very skilled lying Court appointed counsel for the children Adrienne Edwards they both drove my mother to the grave. That is a fact to which I can prove. I hope they both read this when they google their shameful names. Rot in hell you sick cruel filth.


Carey Roberts column

Politicians tweaking the nose of radical feminism

Carey Roberts
August 5, 2011

Two weeks ago Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Democratic National Committee chair, met her match in one Rep. Allen West. It seems that Wasserman Schultz waited until West left the House floor, then cut loose with a liberal jeremiad for the congressman's support of the GOP-supported Cut, Cap, and Balance Act.
Apprised of the incident, the former Lieutenant Colonel fired back, calling her "the most vile, unprofessional, and despicable member of the House of Representatives...If you have something to say to me, stop being a coward and say it to my face."
It wasn't the first time the libber-turned-congresswoman saw her grandstanding tactics backfire.
A couple months ago Wasserman Schultz accused House Republicans seeking to cut off taxpayer abortion funds with waging a "war on women."
In the past, the slightest suggestion of a GOP "war on women" would be enough to bring out the white flag a-flutter. But this time the stiff-spined GOP refused to be buffaloed by the high-octane rhetoric. Within days a group of Republican women fired back, calling Wasserman Schultz's demagoguery "baseless" and "inaccurate."
For years, feminists have succeeded in dictating the parameters and vocabulary of the gender debate. By trotting out a sympathetic victim, playing on lawmaker chivalry, or resorting to outright falsehoods, feminists have been able to maintain hegemony over the public discourse. Politicians, newspaper editors, even university presidents learned to toe the feminist line, or else become tagged with the "anti-woman" moniker.
All that changed on February 18. That's the day the U.S. House of Representatives' continuing resolution bill scrapped the funding for Planned Parenthood's abortion business.
In short order, revenue-pinched state legislatures took up the same refrain. Planned Parenthood funding cuts were approved in Indiana, Kansas, and North Carolina. Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels signed HB 1210, prohibiting abortion providers from receiving state funds.
Another sacred cow of radical feminism is the near-automatic award of child custody to a divorcing woman. The fact that children who lose contact with their loving fathers are far more likely to drop out of school and get in trouble with the law doesn't seem to register with feminist logic (forgive the oxymoron, if you will).
But in recent weeks, a bevy of Republican presidential candidates, including Herman Cain and Gary Johnson, lined up to pronounce the current system deeply flawed. Newt Gingrich castigated the "extreme anti-male bias" of family courts.
Another gem in the feminist diadem is the Violence Against Women Act, which is used as a slush fund by domestic violence groups to support lobbying efforts for a broad array of radical causes. But two weeks ago, House Judiciary Committee member Ted Poe vowed to make the law gender neutral. "I certainly agree with equal protection under the law. And maybe a name change is in order," the Texas congressman explained.
And it's not just politicians who are poking holes in the feminist catechism of gender victimhood.
Following its embarrassing overtime loss to the Japanese women's soccer team, Bryant Gumbel of HBO Sports revealed the double-standard that permeates sports reporting these days. "Had a men's team turned in a similar performance," Gumbel commented, "papers and pundits nationwide would have had a field day assailing the players, criticizing the coach, and demanding widespread changes to a men's national team that flat-out choked."
Then the cheeky "Everything I Do Is Wrong" campaign by the California Milk Processor Board that lampooned clueless men and hormone-addled women. The campaign triggered the wrath of the feminist Politburo, with Ms. Magazine demanding an immediate end to the "sexist" campaign.
The Ms. Magazine antics elicited this rejoinder from columnist Jenn Taylor: "What better way to expose portrayals of women as irrational whiners and hysterical bitches than by whining irrationally and bitching hysterically?"
It gets worse.
It's one thing when conservative knuckle-draggers delight in the excesses of feminism. But when a fellow liberal debunks a feminist sacred cow, that's hitting below the belt!
That's exactly what the current issue of Time magazine does — it puts to the lie the shibboleth that working women pull a second shift when they come home, facing a pile of dirty laundry and shrieking kids, as dad lounges on the porch to watch the Dodgers game. According to Ruth Davis Konigsberg, "Quantitatively speaking, we have no grounds to stand on. And it's time that women — myself included — admit it and move on."
It's getting harder and harder for the gender guerillas to play the victim card. Things are looking grim.


Carey Roberts is an analyst and commentator on political correctness. His best-known work was an exposé on Marxism and radical feminism.
Mr. Roberts' work has been cited on the Rush Limbaugh show. Besides serving as a regular contributor to RenewAmerica.com, he has published in The Washington Times, LewRockwell.com, ifeminists.net, Men's News Daily, eco.freedom.org, The Federal Observer, Opinion Editorials, and The Right Report.
Previously, he served on active duty in the Army, was a professor of psychology, and was a citizen-lobbyist in the US Congress. In his spare time he admires Norman Rockwell paintings, collects antiques, and is an avid soccer fan. He now works as an independent researcher and consultant.
© Copyright 2011 by Carey Roberts
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/roberts/110805
E-mailSubscribeRSSDigg this


The views expressed by RenewAmerica columnists are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of RenewAmerica or its affiliates.