Sunday, September 30, 2012

Kiwi justice 101 = Teen's drastic action.

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Family Violence Death Toll Revealed

Family violence death toll revealed
Nearly 50 per cent of children who die as a result of family violence are killed by their mothers, <a title="a police report says" href="" target="_blank">a police report says</a>. ... Read More
Sad reading and the fools call this the land of milk and honey. Poor kiwi kids mean nothing to a callous society.

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Have You Experienced Partner Aggression?

Top Story

Have You Experienced Partner Aggression?
By Emily M. Douglas, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, School of Social Work, Bridgewater State University

A national research project is recruiting men to participate in a study on men’s experience with partner aggression. Researchers at Clark University and Bridgewater State University are conducting this study on men who have experienced aggression from their girlfriends, wives, or female partners.

If you are a man between the ages of 18-59 and have experienced aggression from a female partner at some point during your life, you may be eligible to participate in this study. Researchers, Denise A. Hines, Ph.D. and Emily M. Douglas, Ph.D., invite you to follow this link to the study webpage where you can complete the online survey about your experience.

Your participation is very important and, in the future, will help men with similar experiences get the help they need. Participation is completely anonymous. They do not ask for your name or any other identifying information in the survey.

The survey takes about 20-30 minutes to complete and is being funded by the National Institutes of Health. Participation is completely voluntary. You may withdraw your participation at any time.

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Monday, September 10, 2012

Fathers4Justice "BAR the BAR" Sacramento, California

Why Fathers Really Matter

Interesting article that the radical feminists will hate.

Why Fathers Really Matter

Biology is making it clearer by the day that a man’s health and well-being have a measurable impact on his future children’s health and happiness. This is not because a strong, resilient man has a greater likelihood of being a fabulous dad — or not only for that reason — or because he’s probably got good genes. Whether a man’s genes are good or bad (and whatever “good” and “bad” mean in this context), his children’s bodies and minds will reflect lifestyle choices he has made over the years, even if he made those choices long before he ever imagined himself strapping on a Baby Bjorn.

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Fathers fight 'scapegoat' treatment | Rotorua News | Local News in Rotorua

In solidarity brothers. The Femily Court is a manufacturer of suicidal dads and cot case kids. It's all thanks to the gravy train of deceit. Follow the blood money honey. The staff who work here cannot have any consciences! These cold reptilian creeps enjoy fracturing families and killing good dads.

Fathers fight 'scapegoat' treatment | Rotorua News | Local News in Rotorua

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Gender Bias In Our Family Court System

 Courts almost always believe a woman over a man today.

Sad fact that our Femily Caught system is allowed to practice blatant unlawful gender discrimination. Many falsely accused dads find the gender bias so overwhelming they suicide as they know the disgusting Femily Caught will never allow him to see his children again .

RIP Wayne C, Joe L, Burt G, Marion B etc..etc...

Gender Bias in Our Family Court System

By Pearle Harbour

Our legal pendulum swings to yet another extreme. Gender bias runs rampant in ourfamily court system. In the 1960's women, fought hard to get laws passed toprotect women against domestic violence. It took many painful years for ourlegal system to recognize women as victims of domestic violence. Domesticviolence, stalking, and sexual harassment laws were passed and enforced toprotect "true victims." Many women lived through domestic violence;many died. Some went to jail for homicide; some were later pardoned. We, aswomen, finally got society to recognize violence against women.

Shame on all those women of the 1990's who now use these laws to their advantage infamily courts to bring men to their knees; and to erase fathers from the livesof their children! False allegations by women of child abuse, domesticviolence, and stalking are almost never questioned by judges for fear of beingpolitically incorrect.

Women who feel justified in punishing men use these false charges indiscriminately. Childrenare forgotten and have become our newest victims with full cooperation from ourFamily Court system. Children need fathers too. A recent US Department ofEducation study, "Fathers Involved in Their Children's Education"(free for a phone call - 1-800-424-1616, option 3) will bear out these truths.

Women have become educated in the ways of our legal system. A new study purportswomen are filing 70% of divorces today. The first person to file usuallywins. The unfortunate person against whom false allegations are chargedmust prove their innocence while a plaintiff proves nothing. As a paralegal anda woman, I am no longer proud of those of female gender who abuse our legalsystem.

An innocent father involved in a nasty contested divorce from a woman who vows vengeance is helpless in Family Court. Important child support laws enacted arenow strictly and sometimes unfairly enforced. There are stories of fathers wholost their jobs from downsizing and/or circumstances beyond their control. Whenthe mother of his children insists on back child support, he is thrown intojail. Child support is based on his "earning ability." Debtor'sprison has become our most recent politically correct means to control men.Here again, our Family Courts condone whatever women allege, accuse, anddictate to control men.

Should a husband make the mistake of remarrying, further angering his ex-wife, asecond wife's income is used as "a way to show ability to pay." Themother of their children, on the other hand, can marry another man. The"other man's" income is never used to lower child support. Court'srationale - "they are not his children, not his responsibility."Since when did a mother bear no responsibility for her children? Today's womenare earning more, and are becoming a majority in our workforce. The stay athome mom of the 50's rarely exists today. I knew of a man who ended up payingso much child support (plus child expenses) he had to move back home with hisparents. Yet his ex-wife earned more than he did.

False allegations of child abuse by a vengeful ex-wife devastate not only children,but fathers. The wife files first to take advantage of all laws passed to protect true victims of abuse and violence. The wife charges everything from domestic violence to stalking to child abuse.

Iknow of a man who was falsely accused of child sexual abuse. By the time he wasfound innocent, he lost his job, his reputation, and everything he owned.Recent statistics do show women are becoming our primary child abusers, andyes, even killers of our children. Yet our Family Courts consistently believe,"the mother always makes the best parent."

Somemothers today emotionally blackmail and intimidate their children intofabricating abuse by their father. I know a man who fought two years to getcustody of his son from a proven mentally ill mother who abused their son. Eachtime the court insisted "the mother is the best parent."

Alarge number of children are ordered to see a child psychologist when divorceis filed. Counselors and psychologists are encouraged by our system to give badreports against a father. Fathers are automatically presumed capable of abusebefore any mother.

Mothersare intentionally denying visitation to loving, child support paying fathers,who then spend money and time in court trying to get visitation enforced. Iknow a man who hasn't seen his son in 14 years, but religiously pays his childsupport. He stopped pursuing visitation in court when the mother threatenedharm to the son. Is this fair? Why is there no press on "intentionaldenial of visitation"?

Oneof the saddest true stories I know of is a little nine year old boy who was putin a mental institution by his mother until he stopped saying, "I want tosee my daddy." There are too many stories of children committing suicide.I personally know of a woman who kept her teenage son up night after nightcrying about her divorce, repeatedly telling him "children ruinmarriages." Her son turned to drinking, drugs, and dropped out of college.

Divorceis a reality. It is currently a billion dollar a year business. Contesteddivorce is guerilla warfare whether people want to acknowledge it or not.Everyone wants fuzzy warm answers to harsh reality. There are none unless weall recognize the gender bias against males perpetuated in Family Court today,and the undeniable damage it does to our children.

Yearsago women had a disadvantage in our domestic courts. Now they can feel quitehappy knowing most women win. They can manipulate child support into"backdoor alimony," deprive their children of their fathers, and ruintheir husband. Truth no longer exists in our legal system.

Yes,we have come a long way. Women can be proud of the laws they fought hard for30+ years ago. I am personally grateful for these laws. Let us not blasphemethose women who died for the very laws that many women are abusing today. Wemust stop abusing these laws, or one day our legal pendulum will swing back andour true victims will not be believed again.

Youthink you are beating men? You are beating yourself; destroying your children;and making the racketeers in our legal system rich. You are creating ageneration of children who think love is conditional and possessive; who learnthat violence by proxy and misuse of the law will make you a winner.

Iwill never be associated with any "feminist" movement which advocatesfalse allegations, destroying children, and eliminating good fathers.

Let'sremember that it is children, not women, who are the real victims of the genderbias in our family courts.

Monday, September 3, 2012

Peter Zohrab speaks sense.

Strategic Thinking and the Road Ahead‏

 Peter Zohrab

On the face of it, Paul Young seems quite justified to complain to the Human Rights Commission about the banning of male viewers from an art gallery video exhibition depicting Muslim women without their hijabs or veils ( Since I am the first Men's Rights ( activist ever in New Zealand (as opposed to a purely Fathers' Rights ( activist), I should be glad that other people are now taking up the cudgels on behalf of men.

However, there are some problems with that stance:

1. Muslim women are too easy a target. Muslims are a tiny minority in New Zealand, and Islamic culture is probably the least anti-male culture on the face of the Earth. Where has Paul Young been, while I have been fighting the much more powerful White feminists and Maori feminists (who seem to dominate the domestic violence industry)? His action looks a little like Muslim-bashing.

2. As far as I know, Muslim society does not just ban men from female social events -- it also bans women from male social events. Therefore it is non-sexist and consistent.

3. The Muslim ban on unmarried and unrelated men and women from mingling socially protects men from false rape allegations. In Western countries, if a drunk man has sex with a drunk woman, the man is quite likely to be accused of rape, because a drunk woman is deemed to be unable to give consent, but drunkenness is not an excuse for (his) "criminal" behaviour. Logically, the woman should also be able to be accused of raping the man -- but we live in a sexist, anti-male society.

4. Moreover -- and here we get to the really sinister part of the story -- the man-hating, feminist rag The Dominion Post actually had the banning of men from this exhibition in big headlines at the top of its front page! That should automatically send up a huge red flag, announcing that something was really wrong here. The only times that The Dominion Post (or Radio New Zealand) has ever tried to interview me about Men's Rights was when they thought they could show me up in a bad light, or when I took them to court for anti-male bias ( A male feminist from The Dominion Post tried to interview me to get some sort of angry or depressed reaction to the fact that (at that time) New Zealand had a female Governor-General, female Prime Minister, female Chief Justice and female CEO of its largest listed company. However, I just said that I was interested in pro-male policies, rather than in male frontmen ( -- so The Dominion Post did not even mention me in its story! So The Dominion Post only headlined this story about Muslim women in order strategically to drive a wedge between Islam and Men's Rights!

5. Here is another red flag: In one media account (, Nicholai Anderson, a senior associate at the law firm Chen Palmer, was quoted as saying that "banning men would be unlawful discrimination by the museum or the people displaying the work." Chen Palmer is run by the feminist networker, Mai Chen, who is one of those rare specimens -- an intelligent feminist. When I was thinking of taking the Institute of Judicial Studies to court over its teaching of so-called "gender equity" to judges (, I spoke to one of Mai Chen's male subordinates about the possibility of his taking on the case pro bono (i.e. for free) -- Chen Palmer is the only New Zealand specialist Public Law firm that I know of. Negotiations broke down, because Mai Chen would only let the firm do it if I made the political concession of criticising the Muslim approach to women (or some aspect of it, such as the hijab and/or veil). Now, it was good that Mai Chen was willing to take the case on for free -- but it shows what women do when you allow them into the workforce: they use their job power for political purposes. I have lived/stayed in Muslim-majority countries for a total of 14 months, and my opinion is that, if we had a choice between the oppression of men in countries like New Zealand and the Muslim system, then the Muslim sysem would be a viable option.

Feminists are always thinking strategically, as you can see by the behaviour of many university lecturers, for example. For a start, the Women's Movement essentially involves the manipulation by Lesbians of other women, in order to create a society where Lesbians can live independently of men -- whether this is in the best interests of other women, of men, or of children -- or not. Then the Feminists have had to get into informal coalitions with ethnic minorities and unionists, etc., forming the sort of "rainbow coalition" which is the backbone of most large Left-wing parties. It is high time that Masculists also started thinking strategically too. At the international (United Nations) level, I have heard that (for example) the Catholics and the Muslims work together. At the national and local level, too, Masculists should work together with Muslims, Catholics, Mormons, other Christian sects, conservative Jews, other religions, conservative ethic minorities, anti-abortionists. and so on.

Peter Zohrab



    Sunday, September 2, 2012

    Happy fathers day.

    Happy fathers men. Give yourself a pat on the back, as the day is an acknowledgement that you are needed in a balanced society. Don’t take any notice of the continual media bombardment which delights itself in portraying men as bubbling idiots. The media are weak feminist controlled lickspittles of the highest order.

    And dads, don’t worry about our Prime Minister developing another homosexual lisp that he caught at the big gay out. Remember men, politicians are held in the same regard as paedophiles. Never trust these progressive scum types who are as dangerous to society as the kiddy f##kers .

    I am 52 and my four grown up children have contacted me from various parts around the globe expressing gratitude and love for their dad. I am bloody chuffed because I must have done something right eh big bruv you deranged fixated creep.

    I hope that all the real role model dads enjoy such strong and loyal bonds of love with their children. Love will conquer all , even a bent justice system. 

    To the dads alienated from their children due to the vile scum that work at that gender bias Femily Caught I say, hang in there mate, I did nearly a decade battling the filth and still didn’t win. Just remember the judges have the blood of many falsely accused fathers on their insipid hands. These same judges look the other way when I confront them. They know they shafted me good and proper.

    Anyway dads, I sincerely hope you enjoy your day. You deserve it mate.