Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Jonathan Emord -- One Drug to Make You Happy

The nut doctors like being drug dealers. Welcome to pill city.   


 Jonathan Emord -- One Drug to Make You Happy
                        Source: newswithviews.com

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Women can be sex abusers too

"students reported that 43 percent of their molesters were female"This figure is alarming and I do wonder what percent of kiwi female teachers are child molesters? I mean to say it must be extremely high, because the men hating feminazi controllers have made life to difficult for male teachers to remain in the teaching profession. Do the authorities know what gender balance is? What chance has a kiwi boy in such a sordid environment.

Women can be sex abusers, too
Ted Nugent is, of course, right, in "No more child-abuse excuses" (Commentary, Friday) but he covered only half the story.
The rest of the story is that we must face the politically incorrect reality that women can be sexual predators, too. The most widely acknowledged examples are female schoolteachers.
The nation needs a paradigm shift wherein we acknowledge the existence of both male and female sexual predators. Support for such a paradigm shift can be found in a 2004 U.S. Department of Education report titled "Educator Sexual Misconduct: A Synthesis of Existing Literature," in which students reported that 43 percent of their molesters were female. Such a high proportion of female abusers demands action, including equal justice under law for both female and male predators.
Until we open our hearts and minds to the reality that women can be sexual predators and that female predators can inflict lifelong harm on those they abuse, our children will remain unprotected from nearly half of America's sexual predators.
Emeritus professor of psychology
Florida International University

Thursday, November 24, 2011

How Come White Ribbon Day Is Gender Bias?


 I detest violence towards women. How come various gender bias campaigns such as this white ribbon rubbish target men when no mention is made about the vicious female violence and abuse which is escalating around the Western world? How come female assaults male is not written into criminal law? How come the Family Court disregards malicious accusations made by a pathological lying mother? How come the male suicide rate for male clients of the Family Court is alarming?How come we don't have a Ministry for the status of men you gender bias feminazi jackbooted man hater? You know where to shove your white ribbon lady!




White Ribbon Day condemns violence

Celebrities, politicians and high-ranking police officers will condemn violence against women as part of White Ribbon Day.
More than 200 events are being held across Australia on Friday to mark the United Nations International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women.
Minister for the Status of Women, Kate Ellis, said men and women needed to be part of the campaign.
"Nearly one in three Australian women experience physical violence since the age of 15 and almost one in five women are victims of sexual violence," she said.
"We need to come together - men and women - to support the victims of violence and importantly, to say loud and clear that violence against women is not something that we will tolerate in Australia."
In Sydney, NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione is leading a white walk against violence, where participants will swear never to commit, excuse or remain silent about violence against women.
Federal MPs Kevin Rudd, Joe Hockey and Peter Garrett have lent their support to White Ribbon Day, along with retired rugby league star Hazem El Masri, comedian Wil Anderson and television personality David Koch.
The UN General Assembly in 1999 declared November 25 as the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women, with a white ribbon as its symbol.
White Ribbon Day began in Australia in 2003, and is Australia's only national male-led violence prevention campaign.

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

Accused often guilty until proven innocent

Accused often guilty until proven innocent


Danmell Ndonye, a freshman at Hofstra University in New York, made the news last week after she accused five men of tying her up and taking turns sexually assaulting her in the bathroom stall of a campus dorm.Police acted quickly and arrested four of the accused rapists soon after Ndonye reported the crime. They spent the next 22 hours in jail while the media broadcast their names and faces across the country. The men were only released when the fifth suspect showed police video of the rendezvous that proved Ndonye had lied and the sex was consensual.
Confronted with the truth, Ndonye recanted her story and confessed to police she had made it up because she had been afraid to tell her boyfriend about the illicit encounter.

If the story sounds familiar, it should. It’s eerily reminiscent of the controversy that erupted in March 2006 when a stripper hired to dance at a party for the Duke University lacrosse team falsely accused several men on the team of raping her. Due to a lack of any corroborative evidence, investigators eventually dropped all charges against the players, though over a year after they were first accused and long after state prosecutors and media personalities had done irreparable damage to their reputations.

When it comes to crimes of sexual assault, we seem to always be in a rush to accuse and condemn the alleged perpetrators. Faced with such heinous crimes, we disregard the judicial process, favoring the rights of the victim and ignoring the rights of the accused.
Several studies show that the problem of false reports of rape may be greater than we realize:
A review of 556 rape accusations filed against Air Force personnel found that 27 percent of women later recanted.

According to a 1996 Department of Justice report, “in about 25 percent of the sexual assault cases referred to the FBI ... the primary suspect has been excluded by forensic DNA testing.”
In a nine-year study of 109 rapes reported to the police in a Midwestern city, Purdue sociologist Eugene J. Kanin reported that in 41 percent of the cases the complainants eventually admitted that no rape had occurred. In a follow-up study of rape claims filed over a three-year period at two large Midwestern universities, Kanin found that of 64 rape cases, 50 percent turned out to be false.
When the mere accusation of sexual assault can ruin a life, these numbers are frightening.
This controversy isn’t about men versus women, he said/she said. It’s about truth. The men Ndonye accused of rape were in jail for nearly a day before they were released. If not for video evidence, they may have spent 25 years in prison for first-degree rape.

They were proven innocent, but the damage to their reputations has already been done.
“Anytime anyone Googles my name, rape is going to be right there beside it. My name is forever tarnished,” one of the five men accused by Ndonye said in a recent New York Post article.
If women feel they’ve been sexually assaulted, they should report it to the police. Always. But they should never make a false accusation and ruin someone’s life simply because they’ve done something they regret.

Meanwhile, the rest of us should be more careful about condemning the accused before they have a chance to prove themselves innocent. Guilty or not, that’s their right.

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

10 Strangest Celebrity Paternity Cases

We recently published an article that you may be interested in entitled, “10 Strangest Celebrity Paternity Cases” (http://www.medicalbillingandcoding.org/blog/10-strangest-celebrity-paternity-cases/).
After having followed your blog for a while, I feel that this one article would align well with your blog's subject matter. I thought perhaps you'd be interested in sharing this article with your readers? Thanks, and keep up the great blogging!

Christine Seivers

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Shock look at NZ's child poverty

Welcome to New Zealand, rugby world cup champions and where kids die from poverty and no one cares. What a sad indictment for such a tiny so called Western Nation. Yeah right, the appalling child abuse statistics and feminized - thuggery tactics from CYF and Family Court scum and we have another recipe for disaster! Meanwhile the gangster politicians just bury their sordid heads in the bureaucratic sand and celebrate another meaningless election.They don't care about kiwi children. They should be hung for treason against kiwi children. God will revenge these creepy callous mongrel dogs. Are all kiwi politicians like the former cold blooded reptilian  PM Hellen Klark?

Poor kiwi kids deserve better from government. John Key is a disgrace to all kiwi kids!

What kind of crackpot could say they're proud to be a New Zealander?

SHAME ON YOU NEW ZEALAND. Vote for a kiwi kid - stay away election day.


Saturday, November 19, 2011

Shocking footage Sealord doesn't want you to see

Hi Peter, 
Today we've released some shocking footage leaked to us by a NZ
helicopter pilot turned whistleblower who flew aerial
reconnaissance for tuna boats in the Pacific.
To protect him we have obscured his identity:
He told us that he witnessed scenes like these on an almost daily
basis. He recalls the day when a pilot whale was dragged onboard
as one of the worst.
The footage shows the needless and gruesome killing of sea
creatures hauled aboard by industrial tuna fishers in the Pacific
Ocean, using the notorious purse seine and fish aggregation device
combo that many tuna brands are now rejecting.
This is the same destructive fishing method still used by the
fishing fleets that supply Sealord, New Zealand's biggest canned
tuna brand.
This footage is not for the faint hearted - but it needs to be
seen and we need to share it with as many people as possible.
Once people have seen something like this they can't fail to act.
Watch the video if you can stand it, and share it with your
circle of contacts:
Nick and the crew at Greenpeace

Saturday, November 12, 2011

Gender bias officials demand proof of relationship

 More evidence that government officials are nothing more than gender bias feminists.These jackbooted men haters need to be removed from positions of authority for fathers to have any fair chance in New Zealand. Sometimes I am ashamed to be a kiwi.

A father-to-be may be deported because the Immigration Service is not convinced he genuinely loves his wife. ...


Friday, November 11, 2011

Good news - Victory for Pastor Jones.

Victory for Pastor Jones; Court Rules that Pastor’s Constitutional Rights Were Violated by “Peace Bond” Trial
November 11, 2011
ANN ARBOR, MI – Yesterday afternoon, Wayne County Circuit Judge Robert Ziolowski ruled that the Wayne County Prosecutor and Dearborn District Judge Mark W. Somers violated the constitutional rights of Pastor Terry Jones and his associate, Wayne Sapp, as a result of the “peace bond” proceedings brought against them this past Spring. The proceedings culminated with Judge Somers throwing Pastor Jones and Sapp behind bars because of their intended speech.
The Circuit Court ruling came in an appeal of the proceedings filed on behalf of Pastor Jones and Sapp by the Thomas More Law Center. The Law Center is a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

In April 2011, Pastor Jones announced his plans to protest Jihad, Sharia Law and the radicalization of Muslims in America on public property in front of the Islamic Center of America, located in Dearborn, Michigan. It is the largest mosque in North America.

The City of Dearborn, with a history of anti-Christian policies, denied Pastor Jones a permit to exercise his free speech rights because of opposition and threats of violence from Dearborn’s large Muslim community. When Pastor Jones indicated that he intended to hold the free speech event anyway, the Wayne County Prosecutor, in cooperation with the City of Dearborn, filed a complaint in the Dearborn District Court. Under threat of arrest, police authorities forced Pastor Jones and Sapp into court where they had to stand trial to determine whether they intended to break the law.

Following the trial, the jury returned a verdict, finding that the free speech activity was likely to breach the peace. Judge Somers then imposed a $1 peace bond and issued an order that prohibited Pastor Jones or Sapp from going within the vicinity of the mosque, including the surrounding public property, for three years. When Pastor Jones and Sapp refused to pay the bond because it was a violation of their right to freedom of speech, Judge Somers committed them to the county jail.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, commented, “Pastor Jones had committed no crime and was not charged with a crime. Yet, he was forced into court and ultimately jailed because he intended to speak out against Jihad and Sharia Law.

Regardless of how one feels about Pastor Jones, he has a constitutionally protected free speech right to express his message. The heavy- handed actions of the City of Dearborn and the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office give us a glimpse of how imposition of Sharia Law, which forbids any criticism of Islam, will destroy that fundamental constitutional right.”

The district court’s judgment was appealed by the Thomas More Law Center, which argued that the peace bond proceedings violated the First Amendment and due process rights of Pastor Jones and Sapp. The Law Center also argued that the three year speech restriction violated the First Amendment.

In yesterday’s ruling, in addition to finding a violation of due process, Judge Ziolowski overturned on First Amendment grounds the District Court’s three-year injunction limiting Pastor Jones’ free speech rights by keeping him away from the mosque.
Wayne County Prosecutors say they’ll appeal to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Woman attacked ex partner after CYF complaint.

I was the unfortunate father on the receiving end of malicious false allegations of sexual child abuse. I can assure you that a untruthful CYF complaint made by a vengeful and vindictive maternal family resulted in the darkest period that I have ever experienced. It destroyed my family. I lost all contact with my two young daughters. Nothing happened about the hundreds of pages of false testimony as police had the dagger in deep and the corrupt court ran with the lies. The rest is history! Sad stuff but who cares? Just imagine if I had attacked my partners lying family for making a FALSE COMPLAINT to CYF? How many years would I have got judge Strettell? How these gender bias creeps can sleep at night is beyond my imagination.

Our gender bias justice system handed her a slap on the hand. What an idiot feminist controlled judge. If a bloke did this he would be behind bars this weekend. What a sick system we have. No wonder kiwi kids are leaving our shores in record numbers. Our country is a disgrace.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Unmanning the Man

Interesting article, worth the read.

Unmanning the Man - Sweden seems to be leading the way.

By Israel Shamir on November 7, 2011

By Israel Shamir – via Peter Myers November 7, 2011

Hollywood installed in us the firm belief in the happy end. Though we know that happy ends are rare, movies time after time enforce this hope, while reality undermines it. Last week, when the British High Court ruled to extradite Julian Assange to Sweden, the hope failed.
A few days earlier I’ve asked Julian what he will do if the court will set him free, after almost a year of house arrest with electronic bracelet on his foot. “I’ll be able to do things on the spur of the moment”, said he, – “unplanned, uncharted – just to go where I want to and do what I wish”. Alas, it is not to be.
This is the season for asses to bray at the captive lion. The Guardian, the newspaper that made millions on ripping Julian’s information mine and later turned into the greatest enemy of the Australian adventurer, published a sleazy piece by an editor of the slimy Swedish right-wing tabloid Expressen, a Ms Karin Olsson. Olsson tells the story of Swedes’ disappointment with Assange “from Hero to zero”, conveniently omitting her part in the action. Character assassination of Assange by media was to a great part her work. The Expressen obtained the news of two feminists’ visit to a friendly policewoman in real time, and splashed the headline “Sought for rape” immediately, before the paperwork reached the attorney office and before the charges were made.
It was fitting the Expressen agenda: the tabloid belongs to Karl Johan Bonnier, a Swedish Murdoch, and his media empire dutifully supported the right-wing government coalition, promoted Sweden’s participation in the US wars, in bombardment of Libya and sending troops to Afghanistan. The Guardian did not mind ordering the hit piece from the newspaper editor who published racist pieces calling for deportation of Arabs from the Swedish paradise. It is odd they did not ask an opinion piece from the Swedish prosecutor Ms Ny who famously said that a man belongs to jail, if a woman brings a complaint – even if the charges can’t make stick.
The costs of Assange’s persecution are huge. This story of shoppers’ regret recycled as rape has cost the realms of Britain and Sweden dearly, and nearly destroyed the person of Julian Assange. To give you an idea of the costs that were incurred at public expense, Julian’s lawyers have already presented him with a bill of 600,000 pounds (about a million US$) for his defence. Surely all the prosecuting lawyers and judges involved in this case will double and triple this considerable sum. Our governments don’t have enough money to pay for schools and health care, but they are always ready to spend millions to put a man behind bars for such a ridiculous charge.
Though there is certainly a political reason, the Assange case is not exceptional, for Sweden is a victim of cruel social experiment of re-gendering: recently, a Swedish man was sent to jail for 18 months for failing to properly wake up his girlfriend before beginning a session of morning sex. Swedish men have good reason to fear the Swedish justice system, and daily they grow more and more afraid of Swedish women. In response, they take foreign wives; they are also increasingly turning gay and adopting children from abroad.
What a shame! Sweden is home to the most dazzlingly beautiful women in the world: perfectly shaped, their blond manes blown by the wind; their blue eyes reflect frankness and encouragement.
Years ago, I was blown away after seeing them for the first time: dancing on a green lawn around a maypole, sun-tanning topless on a low wooden bridge protruding into a lake as blue as the sky above, and sitting like mermaids along the rocks – for Swedish soil is not too soft but full of great stones of iron and copper. These rocks were polished and rolled by the receding ice walls of millennia past when Sweden was freed from its long frozen captivity. The men of Svea laboriously arranged these immense monoliths around an ancient oak tree in imitation of a flotilla. There they heaped high mounds upon the burned remnants of mighty Viking chieftains. Centuries later, these ancient holy places attracted neighbouring churches, decorated from top to bottom by Albertus Pictor in the 15th century.
The oaks are still leafy and mighty, the lakes still clean, the stone armada still standing amid green meadows, but the churches are empty. They have become clubs for old ladies, led by a lady pastor – as I witnessed last Sunday in a beautiful church near Vasteras. Men have been slowly pushed out of positions of power in the Church, and now the worshippers have lost interest.
It is not only Swedish churches that have lost their manly shepherds, Swedish newspaper owners prefer to hire and advance obedient women like Karin Olsson; there are few male editors, excepting the gays. Swedish publishers now only publish books that will appeal to women; books that glorify women and depict men as monsters, like the dreadful Millennium Trilogy written by the PR-savvy Stieg Larsson. Swedish museums exhibit the kind of art that is designed to appeal to a female-centric New Age audience. Swedish universities are dominated by female professors. In Sweden, it hurts your career if you are discovered to be a heterosexual male. It feels like the country is at war with natural sexuality: the schoolbooks promote a unisex standard; children are referred to as “it” instead of “he” or “she”, and the lightest flirtation has been criminalised.
The war against males has not resulted in a more compassionate Sweden. The Swedish welfare state is being dismantled by the right-wing followers of Ronald Reagan; Neocon Karl Rove is sending Swedish soldiers to die for NATO in Afghanistan, and bombing Libya in the name of the Swedish state. Nor have the civilians of Sweden fared well under the new regime. They eat more junk food, and obesity – previously unknown in the North – now disfigures their once beautiful bodies. Their thoughts have been controlled by a newly consolidated media and their hard-won freedoms traded away in the name of compassion.
Looking back, it seems that Sweden’s freedoms, as well as our own, peaked just after the long-gone year of 1968. At the time, Sweden was the most implacable foe of the US-led war in Vietnam. US deserters once dreamt of escaping to fair Sweden with the same fervent desire of Heller’s Yossarian. In those days the Swedish girls pursued adventures, not legal strategies. Swedish men spent their days building up the church, moulding a uniquely Scandinavian social state, creating Bergman films and Volvo cars. Now even Volvo was sold off to the Americans, and they promptly sold it to the Chinese.
1968 was a turning point in America as well. In 1968, the richest Americans contributed 90% of their income to the state, while now they pay less than 30%. Never mind that they do not pay even that by the use of tax shelters, funds and other tricks. It was in 1968 that the American worker’s minimum pay peaked in real terms. Looking back, 1968 was the moment in history when mankind was nearest to the stars.
Children of the defeated ’68 revolution, we were free to love, smoke, think and act. We could travel and fly without being stripped at the airport, and our booze was not confiscated. We could make love and smoke in cafes. Since then, it was downhill all the way: smoke was banned, free thought was incarcerated by Political Correctness, and political action has been reduced to joining a Facebook group. Love has been turned into minefield by Victorian laws. We have been transported back to the days when Mr. Pickwick might be sued by his landlady for breach of promise. Sweden is not the only victim of this revolutionary zeal. Everywhere, all over the world, men are losing their place under the sun; it may be more than a coincidence that our freedoms vanish along with them.
Is there a method to this madness? The great conspiratorial mind and modern Russian prophet Alexandre Dugin declared that there is an ancient female conspiracy that aims to return us to a Matriarchy. Many conservative observers put the blame on feminists. Yet even though men have clearly lost the war, the victory of women wilts under examination. Once upon a time women had a choice: they could join the business world or stay at home with the kids. Once upon a time women could raise a family without guilt. Once upon a time women could enjoy being flirted with. Not any more. Unmanning man was quickly followed by the un-womaning of woman.
I think the reality is worse than Dugin’s wildest conspiracy. There is an understanding between the holders of power that feminised men are easier to control. Unmanning men is a linchpin in the reprogramming of mankind into an obedient herd, because strong men are unpredictable. Strong men are prone to rebellion, ready for sacrifice and primed for action. It is no coincidence that the enemies of Empire are all masculine males, be they Qaddafi, Castro, Chavez, Lukashenko, Putin – or Julian Assange. It appears the men have been targeted for elimination; the working ants need no sex.
The feminist agenda became the easiest way to lock the man up, as we learned from the DSK case. Dominique Strauss Kahn lost his coveted job at the helm of the IMF, and this powerful position passed to a woman who is not likely to jeopardise the US dollar supremacy.
A false statement by a professional cheat was all that was necessary to steal his freedom, which he regained after spending a lot of money. Another thing that was necessary was connivance of the mainstream media which is a sure sign that something is wrong.
DSK must be quite a man, judging by his excellent, gifted, strong-minded, and successful wife. It may be he is a Zionist Capitalist beast, but as one man to another I can’t fault him for making a pass at a “talented journalist and novelist in France”, nor for flirting with “a brilliant Hungarian economist”. He is, after all, a Frenchman first. They each had their opportunity to say “non”, and so they did. In a healthy society this would suffice.
Did DSK’s advances constitute “harassment”? Perhaps, but so what? I am continuously harassed by banks that send me offers of credit – are these less damaging to my psyche than an offer to frolic in the hay? Is a business proposition less annoying than an amorous one? These women simply refused his advances, just as I refuse the banks – and yet I do not resort to the courts, whereas they have sought both compensation and revenge. Might we not just as well sue the Zuleika Dobsons of this world for the sexual power they hold over their unwilling thralls? Must we castrate our men, cover our women, or erect separation walls like the ones on Indian trains?
The attacks on Assange, DSK and Qaddafi are all part and parcel of the campaign to unman humanity. The Empire hates Lukashenko and Putin not only because they do not let them seize the country’s assets, but also for their outspoken masculinity. Eric Walberg in his Great Games speaks of the deeper strategy behind the colour revolutions: their organisers “castrate modern states” in order to transform them into post-modern weaklings. This “castration” is an important plan of the rulers, far more profound than the ephemeral struggles over pipelines and resources.
The defeat of Julian Assange is a defeat for all the men, and a defeat for mankind, promising a bleak future – unless we shall do something about it. It is not only our freedom but our manhood is at stake.


Sunday, November 6, 2011



0 – Number of district attorneys in the United States who routinely prosecute false allegations of domestic violence.

25 – Estimated percentage of divorces in which an allegation of domestic violence is made .

32 – Number of states with civil definitions of domestic “violence” that include being afraid, fearful, apprehensive, or experiencing emotional distress .

48 – Number of states in which judges awarding child custody are required to consider allegations or findings of domestic violence .

50 – Percentage of restraining orders in which physical assault is not even alleged, according to an authoritative Massachusetts study.

70 – Percentage of restraining orders that are trivial or false .

85 – Percentage of all restraining orders that are issued against men (the remaining 15% are against women).

2000 – Estimated number of taxpayer dollars spent for the issuing, servicing, and adjudicating of one restraining order.

2005 – The year in which a restraining order was served on TV personality David Letterman for allegedly beaming televised code words and seductive eye gestures at Colleen Nestler, a woman whom Letterman had never met.

700,000 – Number of persons wrongfully arrested for domestic violence each year .

1.5 million – Number of temporary restraining orders issued each year in the United States that are trivial or false .

20 billion – Number of dollars that taxpayers spend each year for welfare and public benefit services arising from false allegations of domestic violence that force children into single-parent households .

1. Allen DW, Brinig M. Anticipated and unanticipated legal changes:
The case of joint parenting. February 2007. Table 7, Column 2.

2. SAVE. Expanding Definitions of Domestic Violence. Rockville, MD.

3. American Bar Association. Custody decisions in cases with domestic
violence allegations.

4. Massachusetts Trial Court Office of the Commissioner of Probation.
Restraining Order Violators, Corrective Programming, and Recidivism.
Boston, MA. November 1, 2004.

5. SAVE. The Use and Abuse of Domestic Restraining Orders. Rockville,
MD. 2010. http://www.saveservices.org/downloads/VAWA-Restraining-Orders

6. Young C. Domestic Violence: An In-depth Analysis. Washington, DC:
Independent Women’s Forum, 2005. p. 25.

7. Watson B. The High Price of Restraining Orders. Daily Finance. March
30, 2010.

8. SAVE. Arrest Policies for Domestic Violence. Rockville, MD. 2010.

9. SAVE. What is the Cost of False Allegations of Domestic Violence?
Rockville, MD. 2010.

10. SAVE. How False Allegations Harm Families and Children. Rockville,
MD. 2010.

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Recall Notice


The Maker of all human beings (GOD) is recalling all units manufactured, regardless of make or year,due to a serious defect in the primary and central component of the heart.
This is due to a malfunction in the original prototype units code named Adam and Eve,resulting in the reproduction of the same defect in all subsequent units. ...
This defect has been identified as "Sub sequential Internal Non-morality," more commonly known as S.I.N.,as it is primarily expressed.
Some of the symptoms include:

1. Loss of direction
2. Foul vocal emissions
3. Amnesia of origin
4. Lack of peace and joy
5. Selfish or violent behaviour
6. Confusion and lying
7. Fearfulness
8. Idolatry
9. Rebellion

The Manufacturer, who is neither liable nor at fault for this defect, is providing factory-authorized repair and service free of charge to correctthis defect.
The Repair Technician, JESUS, has most generously offered to bear the entireburden of the staggering cost of these repairs.
There is no additional fee required. The number to call for repair in all areasis: P-R-A-Y-E-R.
Once connected, please upload your burden of SIN through the REPENTANCEprocedure.
Next, download ATONEMENT from the Repair Technician, Jesus, into the heartcomponent.

No matter how big or small the SIN defect is, Jesus will replace it with:
1. Love
2. Joy
3. Peace
4. Patience
5. Kindness
6. Goodness
7. Faithfulness
8. Gentleness
9. Self control
Please see the operating manual, the B.I.B.L.E. (BEST Instructions Before Leaving Earth) for further details on the use of these fixes.

WARNING: Continuing to operate thehuman being unit without correction voids any manufacturer warranties, exposingthe unit to dangers and problems too numerous to list, and will result in thehuman unit being permanently impounded. For free emergency service, call onJesus.
DANGER: The human being units notresponding to this recall action will have to be scrapped in the furnace. TheSIN defect will not be permitted to enter Heaven so as to prevent contaminationof that facility. Thank you for your attention! - GOD P.S. Please notify othersof this important recall notice, and you may contact the Father any time by'Knee mail'!

Because HE Lives!