Without prejudice .
Due to various comments made about this post on kiwiblog by some anonymous coward blogger's like roger nome and peak oil conspiracy etc... I must advise that all mentioned parties in this blog have been sent a link to this post.
I do want the chance to get this before a Court . I am prepared for any of the serious consequences that I will face. Personal power will continue as I post my entire case on the net . It will shock many, however, it's the only way I can get the truth out so it cannot happen to your kids or grand children ?
Principal Family Court Judge
Level 8, Solnet House.
70 The Terrace
58 Avonside Drive.
Christchurch 1. Office Tel: 0 –3 –981-3157.
Fax: 0 –3 –981-3179.
Home Phone: 981 –3850.
Mobile: 025 2266374.
P O Box 3221
Fax: 365 5762
Dear Peter , John and Michael .
Congratulations to cyfswatch web site for helping to expose this widespread unacceptable behaviour .The systematic corruption must stop as you snakes have destroyed my family and killed my mother .
I have emailed all those so called de -family court professionals a copy of this blog post and challenged them all with the statement " please take me to Court if offended ."
Whats another bad mark against my name, as the corrupt gravy train of blood sucking parasites have already tainted me with 14 false convictions and destroyed my life .
As our twisting acid tongued Prime Minister would swank from her insidious gob ;
BRING IT ON !
I have thought long and hard about my previous posting about John Watson, who helped create the insidious cyfs monster that has become a dysfunctional / bureaucratic inertia. I foolishly thought I could take civil proceedings against his malicious behaviour. However it is with much regret to inform all, that the court will not even listen to my genuine grievance. It was always going to be a bit like David and Goliath, however there are no stones in the river. Who said you could seek natural justice in New Zealand is a deluded fool. Stuff the consequences of this email as I think I owe it , to my family and my deceased mother the dignity of the truth, which is only fair.
I welcome any legal implications from my posting, maybe it will help me achieve some balanced/fair justice. Yeah right. This John Watson should be struck off for professional misconduct. It was reported by cyfs social workers in 2001 that my two daughters loved me heaps and felt safe with me. I was the happy dad for years, whom tucked my beautiful daughters into bed most nights, before I read them a bedtime story. They enjoyed their dad who was so proud that he could help nurture them on a daily basis.
I first started writing my concerns about my case to the Principal Family Court Judge’s Chambers 20th February 2002. I have 13 meaningless replies from the ineffective Chambers.
Now because of an judicial old boy’s network protecting and pervading the New Zealand's justice system I am deemed a threat to all children, and not worthy of forming healthy bonds with my own flesh and blood. The cruel litigation has meandered on for years, the vile parental alienation syndrome tactics employed by all are causing adversity for all the parties concerned.
Here is proof that Judge Boshier and the many unscrupulous greedy gravy train professional’s that have attached themselves to the disgraceful litany of lies.
In 2004 Boshier and myself exchanged letters via New Zealand Post.
My letters were a complaint regarding the two bias and totally unfair psychological reports presented to the court by specialist Family Court report writer, clinical psychologist Dr. Michael Davidson. A judge first directed Davidson to in the 2002 to write a specialist assessment to be obtained under S29A of the Guardianship Act 1968. The trauma this bias /unfair report affected me that much I am completely lost the plot. In his opinion he unfairly obliterated my emotional landscape and said that I should see my girls in a few years time with a security guard present. I was so upset. Police arrested me at Armed Offenders roadblock. I was incarcerated in a round cell at Paparua prison then got a early Christmas present and sent off to the Hillmorton Hospital, as a court directed compulsory mental health patient. I was forced to take the terrible psychotropic medications. Also I mentioned to Boshier the disgraceful conduct of the first court appointed counsel for child, Chris Robertson from Ashburton who told my mother that she could not deliver her grand daughters birthday and presents to his Ashburton Office. Mum was upset she had a heart attack and admitted to Christchurch Hospital Christmas 2001.Boshier terminated all correspondence with this letter from the Principal Family Court Judge’s Chambers.
14 October 2004
Dear Mr Burns
Thank you for your letter of 12 October 2004. I will not be responding any further on this issue.
Principal family Court Judge.
The court appoints John Watson in July 2005. He is brought into proceedings to write a specialist/report/assessment under section 133 of the Care of Children Act 2004.
Boshier cannot explain his latest reply, which was the first correspondence I have heard from him since the October 2004 letter.
The Principal Family Court Peter Boshier is undoubtedly involved in what I regard as a “ arrogant subversion of the justice system.”
Reply from Boshier
23rd January 2007
Dear Mr Burns
Thank you for your letter to me of 15 January concerning a registered psychologist, John Watson. I know that you and I have had correspondence before and in particular concerning, Mr Watson.
My previous view to you has been that in relation to a psychologist, I have no jurisdiction to take action. It is a matter to be considered by either the Court hearing the case or the Psychologists Registration Board. It would be quite wrong of me to give you any other impression.
Principal Family Court Judge.
My first Letter to Boshier regarding former cyfs worker manager, parole board and family court reports writer John Watson.
Principle Family Court Judge of New Zealand
Judge P F Boshier
P O Box 10 –167
15 January 2007
I seek your learned opinion about the lewd behaviour of a Family Court psychologist called John Watson.
I have brought this matter to your attention as I have lost all faith and confidence in the Family Court system that allows this type of conduct.
Surely it is not acceptable behaviour and certainly not in the publics best interests. As the Judge responsible for the Family Court you must consider this complaint about Watson and act accordingly.
John Watson must be held accountable to protect the judicial system’s impartiality, integrity and independence.
The Complaint is as follows;
January. My mother finally gets to enjoy two unsupervised hours with all four of her grand children at her Rakaia huts property. This is the first time for five years as a persecuted paternal grandmother she enjoys the luxury of being in the loving company of all four of my children.
February. I am admitted to Christchurch Accident and Emergency Department with a heart attack after I discovered my Family Court lawyer Tony Greig had not been sending letters onto my daughters.
June.A Family Court Judge Strettell asks for affidavits to be prepared and submitted by my mother and twin sons. They all speak of how greatly the injustice has affected them.
July .The Family Court requests psychologist John Watson to update a report pursuant to section 133 Care of Children Act 2004. He is instructed to contact the following parties to access proceedings, namely - both sets of grandparents, parent’s partners, children’s schoolteacher and Hillmorton Hospital. I ring him and tell him to please leave my mum out of proceedings due to her rapidly deteriorating health. He acknowledges my concern and tells me he will not contact my mother .My partner is witness to him saying that as she was listening on the other phone.
The Family Court Judge Strettell and acting lawyers Geoff Kean and child counsel - Adrienne Edwards are told that my mother would like to inform the Court that she can longer handle being part of the proceedings due to her failing heart condition. The Court is told that mum’s affidavit, was sworn in at the Christchurch Family Court by a registrar 1st July 2005. It made it plainly clear to the Family Court that my mother cannot take the proceedings any longer, as she has found the treatment of the paternal family to be totally unfair and a traumatic experience. My mother’s affidavit clearly shows the hurt, stress and heartbreak the Family Court had forced my poor mum to endure. All parties to the proceedings including the Judge at the hearing said they could understand my mother’s situation and agreed that it would be better if mum was left out of further proceedings.
November.Inexplicably the Family Court appointed Psychologist John Watson telephone’s my mother. She becomes so upset by his phone call my lovely female partner, who witnessed her reaction came home in a tearful state and told me that she had to put my mother in bed after the despicable phone call. My mother died heartbroken four days after Watson’s phone call. I am so upset about the unfairness of the Family Court. I thought I had an assurance from a Family Court judge that mum’s request to be excluded from future proceedings was official, and was recognized by the Court some months earlier. The disgusting situation deteriorates even further when you consider the vile fact that the Court appointed psychologist report writer failed in his bias wisdom to contact the maternal grandparents. Watson is recorded as describing the maternal family as one of the most vengeful and vindictive he has ever known. He was most concerned about my ex partner withholding a letter from cyfs that I obtained through the Privacy Commissioner’ Office. This letter clearly showed that the cyfs investigation initiated after the anonymous informant was of no valid foundation.Cyfs social workers say “ After a home visit and talk with the girls, we are satisfied that the children are kept safe from abuse “ Watson did not mention this is in his report and did not show any balance. Shamefully as again instructed to do so, he failed to contact Hillmorton Hospital – Dr Mark Earthroll. Watson is a proven liar.He recommends I see my alienated daughters on one or two years with a security guard present .
Watson’s conduct is beyond belief. If this is acceptable behaviour from a so-called Family Court professional, then God help all the paternal families he has involvement with.
I know of an another parental grandmother here in Christchurch that spoke to Watson in phone conservation for two hours in 2001. She got her hopes up that he would write a positive report, as she made it very clear that she was extremely concerned about the welfare of her primary school grand son . She did not like his alienation from the paternal family, and that her grandson needed her for his best interests and needs. He promised her that he would make a court report. She was horrified that Watson did not make a report for the court .She contacted him two years later via phone and she said do you remember me and the phone conversation we had for two hours in 2001? He blatantly lied to this heartbroken grandmother by stating he could not remember the call. The young lads lawyer Michelle Cook said the father was a jail bird , which was a lie , so the system could justify the callous parental alienation tactics endorsed by corrupt crown law employee ! The father has given up and the gran mother is talking suicide . Well done cyfs, family court and Ruth Dyson !!!
He must be held accountable, and our families want Watson on receiving end of natural justice. This is a truthful affidavit is an official complaint about his malicious behaviour. We are all struggling to know why he would have done this to us . I feel like bashing him big time but I will not because another stint in jail would kill me !! The victims of his sordid lies ,these elderly grandmothers’ did not deserve this, as they were all were such honest and kind ladies. They did not understand this evil miscarriage of justice firmly entrenched and disguised in a secret sinister court system. We are thankful for our mum’s who taught us all the importance of love, virtues, morals and a healthy respect for family and others.
Why did the family court persecute my mother ? Why did they break her spirit ?
December 2005 .For the second time that sad year I get to spend four unsupervised hours with my daughters. My daughters are sad their gran had died, however my alienated children are extremely happy to in the company of their unfairly treated loving and caring dad, who did not need the services of a tax payer funded security guard!
I have withdrawn from all Family Court proceedings after several years of excruciating heartbreak. I had to distance myself the judicial corruption and unlawful gender bias that has inexplicably occurred. The malign Family Court wanted a fourth psychological specialist’s report to be conducted.
I want John Watson struck off as a registered psychologist, as his conduct is clearly malfeasance. I intend on bringing a substantial lawsuit against this man for his unbalanced, bias and criminal behaviour.
27 Elizabeth Street
It is better to be nobly defeated on principle than win on lies – dad4justice